Here you have to extract what all are the techniques existing as a solution for the particular problem and the pros and cons of those. Better to keep it short.
Sample output[ edit ] Opening abstract of Rooter: In order to solve this riddle, we confirm that SMPs can be made stochastic, cacheable, and interposable. The authors of SCIgen described their hoax on their website, and it soon received great publicity when picked up by Slashdot.
WMSCI withdrew their invitation, but the SCIgen team went anyway, renting space in the hotel separately from the conference and delivering a series of randomly generated talks on their own "track.
Submitting the paper was a deliberate attempt to embarrass WMSCI, which the authors claim accepts low-quality papers and sends unsolicited requests for submissions in bulk to academics. As the SCIgen website states: One useful purpose for such a program is to auto-generate submissions to conferences that you suspect might have very low submission standards.
His conclusion was that "a reliable gibberish filter requires a careful holistic review by several peer domain experts". The author is named after the Swedish short film Der Schlangemann. Inafter receiving a series of Call-for-Paper e-mailsa couple of students used the SCIgen computer program to generate a false scientific paper titled Towards the Simulation of E-Commerce, using "Herbert Schlangemann" as the author.
The authors can clearly identify important features of visualization of DHTs and analyze them insightfully. It is recommended that the authors should develop ideas more cogently, organizes them more logically, and connects them with clear transitions.
The entire story is described in the official "Herbert Schlangemann" blog and it also received attention in Slashdot  and the German-language technology-news site Heise Online.
List of other works with notable acceptance[ edit ] See also: Predatory conference Rob Thomas: The paper was subsequently removed when the publishers were informed that it was a joke paper. Gelfand was protesting against the journal, which was apparently not peer reviewed and was being used by Russian PhD candidates to publish in an " accredited " scientific journal, charging them Rubles to do so.
The accreditation was revoked two weeks later. Using this method the author managed to rank "Ike Antkare" ahead of Albert Einstein for instance.IEEE can decline to publish the conference proceedings that do not meet IEEE's quality standards.
Do not claim or guarantee that any papers will be indexed in any database. Indexing services evaluate conferences and independently determine what they will index.
A trusted source for researchers for over years, IEEE offers an unparalleled platform for showcasing your work. Read 73 answers by scientists with 56 recommendations from their colleagues to the question asked by Mohammad Bazmara on Sep 25, Authors publish with IEEE for the heightened visibility, research activity, and industry credibility.
IEEE continues to be the most cited publisher in the U.S. and European new technology patents.
Authors will find that publishing with the IEEE ensures professional development and exposure of their works. The IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO) publishes research papers that represent major advances in the state-of-the-art in all areas of robotics.
The Transactions welcomes original papers that report on any combination of theory, design, experimental studies, analysis, algorithms, and integration and application case studies involving all aspects of robotics. Read 79 answers by scientists with 64 recommendations from their colleagues to the question asked by Mohammad Bazmara on Sep 25,